For your second and third posts, I’m going to have you change things up a bit.  Instead of commenting on a fellow students’ post first, then submitting a final post, I would like you to instead respond first to my question below, and THEN briefly respond to a fellow students’ (2nd) post.  This last post should not necessarily pose a question, however, since the student will not be responding back.  I’m basically switching up our usual structure – make sense?  So, here’s the new question:

 

1.  Identify an individual, preferably from the readings, but not necessarily, who was largely influential in the urban parks movement or the planning of early suburbs.  What was his/her major contribution?  To what extent (if any) did a sense of morality or “respectability” figure in to the planning of the typology?